Search for: All records

Glacial landforms provide a valuable record from which to study the history and dynamics of past ice sheets. Eskers record paleo subglacial hydrologic and sediment transport conditions because they are composed of sediment deposited by water flowing through subglacial channels. Despite decades of study, there is still debate about their formation mechanisms and little investigation of the differences between eskers formed over soft and hard beds. To address this complexity, we analysed eskers formed over soft beds along the southern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) in the Lake Superior region. This included developing a new method to calculate the basal effective pressure gradient during esker formation along the subglacial channel using grain size estimates from a 20 m tall esker exposure. The morphometry and distribution of eskers were mapped with GIS to quantify their sinuosity and lateral spacing, and to compare those to the underlying bedrock elevation and sediment thickness. Lateral spacing decreased over time as the ice margin retreated, suggesting that melt rates increased during the LIS deglaciation. Furthermore, the relation between esker distribution and sediment thickness showed that eskers formed preferentially over thinner layers of sediment, irrespective of whether erosion occurred before their formation. The sedimentology of the Cable Esker exhibits a non‐monotonic pattern in channel boundary shear stress ranging from 10 to 300 Pa, alongside a basal effective pressure gradient fluctuating between −9 to −70 Pa m⁻¹. Negative basal effective pressure gradients are consistent with esker formation in channels close to the glacier terminus, which suggests lower water pressure than normally assumed. This, combined with dynamic water level fluctuations within the esker channel, supports the theory of the formation of eskers near the ice margin. 

Glacial kettles are surficial depressions that form in formerly glaciated terrain when buried stagnant ice melts within pro‐glacial sediments, often deposited by meltwater streams. Kettles, like other glacial landforms, provide insight into the impact of climate on landscape evolution, such as the extent and timing of glaciations. The geometry of kettle features is variable, but existing theory does not explain the range of observed morphologies. Our study aims to establish a quantitative relationship between the depth of ice burial and the resulting morphology of terrain collapse in kettle depressions. To do so, we simulated kettle formation in the laboratory by burying ice spheres of four sizes in well‐sorted coarse sand at four different depths. As the spheres melt at room temperature, a glacial kettle analog forms at the surface. We scanned the resulting kettle topography with a portable LiDAR scanner to produce 3D digital elevation models of each depression, from which we measured each depression's depth and width and, in one instance, the time series of kettle formation. Using this data, we quantified the relationship between the sphere diameter, burial depth and resulting dimensions of the kettle by developing a set of equations, which we then applied to full‐scale features. Our results indicate that ice burial deeper than one sphere diameter corresponds to a decrease in depression depth and an increase in depression width. This application offers insight into the interdependence of ice burial depth and kettle geometry. 

Abstract Shore ice is an important facet of cold‐climate coastal geomorphology yet is generally understudied in comparison to other aspects such as nearshore hydrodynamics. Climate change is resulting in more dynamic shore ice regimes (i.e., shortened ice season and multiple freeze–thaw cycles); thus, a clear understanding of the role of shore ice in coastal geomorphic evolution is needed. The presence of shore ice is generally thought to provide the coast a protective buffer from storm waves though some studies have indicated enhanced nearshore erosion and sediment transport associated with ice development. This is particularly apparent during the breakup phase of shore ice as sediment can be scoured from the bed, deposited in place, or transported offshore. Given this, understanding the mechanics of shore ice breakup is critical. This study documents the first combined field and laboratory evaluation of the physical conditions leading to shore ice breakup, detailing the complex interplay between thermal and mechanical processes in ice deterioration. Through a wave tank experiment as well as field observations, wave impacts alone are shown to be unlikely to cause breakup of shore ice and thermal weakening is required. This has important implications both for predicting when ice will break up as well as for identifying potential nearshore sediment transport pathways. If ice breaks up entirely from thermal degradation, then sediment is likely to be deposited in place, whereas if ice breaks up from a combination of thermal degradation and wave impact, then sediment can be redistributed across the shoreface. Monitoring of meteorological conditions during ice breakup can likely be used as a first‐order predictor of geomorphic changes resulting from shore ice deterioration.